Posts in Employment Law
Nondisplacement Revoked Again: The Right of First Refusal for Employment By Federal Contractor Employees Was Already Gone, But DOL Just Buried the Rules.

DOL completed part of its deregulatory efforts yesterday when it fully revoked the regulations issued by former President Biden’s Administration on so-called nondisplacement of workers. The new DOL action involved the rescission of regulations published by the previous administration in 2023 requiring contractors and subcontractors to give qualified employees the right of first refusal of employment with a successor contract.  

Read More
When It Comes to Prevailing Wage Laws, the New Revolutionary FAR Overhaul is Not Very Revolutionary in Spirit

I have looked at the FAR Part 22 labor and employment provision changes in the proposed Revolutionary FAR Overhaul. To my eyes they don’t seem so “revolutionary.” Mostly, what they do is move the interpretive regulations to the new FAR Companion or other resources. That may reduce their importance. And that may make it easier to evade compliance. But that isn’t likely to change much for the prevailing wage field since the FAR regulations were simply a restatement of the Department of Labor’s (“DOL’s”) Part 4 and 5 regulations found in 29 Code of Federal Regulation. Those DOL regulations have been around for a long time. Taking provisions out of the regulatory book (yet leaving DOL’s regulatory scheme in place) and leaving existing statutory provisions on the books, does NOT constitute a “revolution.”

Read More
Back to Basics: the Successor Contractor Rule Embodied In Section 4(c) of the Service Contract Act

This back-to-basics blog just touches on a few of the many possible issues that come up under the SCA section 4(c) successor contractor rule. That rule can require successor contractor to pay not less than the wages and fringes set forth in the predecessor’s collective bargaining agreement. It is a very complex area of the law, and it is one place where the engagement of  competent SCA counsel may aid in dealing with disputes.

Read More
The One Big Beautiful Tax Bill Proves Why the FLSA Is Still the Most Important Law Enacted By Congress

My candidate for the most important law enacted by Congress is the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). This law had perhaps the greatest economic impact upon the most Americans of any legislation. And its legacy endures even today, as it makes an appearance in the so-called One Big Beautiful Tax Bill as the instrument to partially deliver Trump’s promised no tax on overtime.

Read More
Pay Up You Deadbeat: Frequency of Payment of Wages on U.S. Government Contracts

How often employers must run their payroll for federal government contract work is dependent on the contract terms and where you are performing the work. The requirement usually varies from weekly to monthly, but employers need to review both your contract and state and local wage laws and regulations. The answer is that “it depends.”

Read More
More Changes at DOL: FLSA Liquidated Damages Off the Table During Wage and Hour Investigations

The Trump Administration announced on June 25, 2025, that investigators of the Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division (WHD) no longer will be authorized to seek the payment of liquidated damages for Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) violations during the course of prelitigation investigations. This policy is the latest development in the Administration’s roll-back of wage and hour policies implemented by the Biden Administration.

Read More
Going; Going; Gone – Repeal of the $17.75 an Hour Contractor Minimum Wage

The $17.75 Contractor Minimum Wage Executive Order is rescinded. But the Obama-era $13.30 Contractor Minimum Wage Executive Order remains in place. That creates some confusion. It is my opinion that the workers formerly covered by the $17.75 an hour minimum wage are now covered by the $13.30 minimum wage, or any higher wage required by the prevailing wage laws or state or local government minimum wages.

Read More
The DEI Executive Order: A Risky Turn on a Dime for Federal Contractors?

President Trump’s DEI Executive Order is an attempt to turn the ship of state on a dime with respect to anti-discrimination and diversity policies. Among other things, the order will require contractors and grantees to certify they don’t operate programs promoting DEI. The consequence of being wrong? — potential False Claims Act liability.

Read More
The Last Goodbye “Gift” from the Biden DOL to Davis-Bacon Covered Construction Contractors

DOL has issued a new payroll reporting form for government construction contractors performing Davis-Bacon work for recordkeeping purposes and is forcing them to certify their fringe benefits and wage deductions weekly. Employers who mess up the new weekly fringe benefit and wage deduction reporting thus can be subject to heavy sanctions -- including allegations they submitted false payrolls and/or failed to report improper wage deductions.

Read More
The Truck Stops Here: DOL’s Enforcement Actions Against Fine Print

The US Department of Labor (“DOL”) announced actions it is taking to combat what it calls “coercive ‘fine print’ provisions” in employment agreements. One such action led to an injunction that barred a company from using its employment agreement to shift the cost of a wage and hour suit onto the very truck drivers who brought the claim. So, be advised—DOL is reading your fine print.

Read More
A Minimalist Opinion Comes Out in the Maximus Bid Protest Case

The Government Accountability Office ("GAO") whiffed in its recent decision in the Maximus Federal Services bid protest. The contractual Labor Harmony Agreement ("LHA") clause violates the FAR neutrality mandates, and a long line of previous decisions says GAO could have stepped up and curbed this excess. It was a missed opportunity for GAO to do the right thing.

Read More
We Have Met the Enemy… Texas Court Strikes Down FTC Non-Compete Ban

Last week, a Texas Federal Court granted a permanent injunction that strikes down the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) much-maligned ban on employee non-compete agreements. Many tout this ruling as a HUGE victory for employers. But which employers? Current ones? Future ones? Perhaps “we have met the enemy and he is us” (thanks Walt Kelly and Pogo).

Read More
The Deviants Are Agency Actions Which Are Taken Without Securing a FAR Deviation: SCA, DBA and NLRA Additive Contractual Terms

Some changes agencies make to US Government contracts may vary existing rules and thus constitute deviations to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”). Deviations to the FAR require approval of the FAR Council. The contracting agency is not free to implement special contract terms which deviate from the FAR without securing that approval.

Read More
Blog Two: Timing of New Wage Determinations for Remote Workers – Service Contract Act (“SCA”) Telework Issues  

The timing of when to add a new Service Contract Act (“SCA”) wage determination (“WD”) to a contract for remote workers can get rather complex. It depends on the facts. And the guidance is rather sparse. Here we try to parse the rules and offer some practical guidance.

Read More