Posts in By Daniel Abrahams
The Aftermath of the Click to Cancel Court Ruling – Amazon, Xfinity, Bloomberg, and Thomson Reuters are Just Three Examples of Bad Actors

This blog is a call for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to follow up and issue new rulemaking on the click to cancel issue. This isn’t a partisan issue. It is a question of farness and corporate responsibility. Without some new regulations, corporate America is allowing roguish policy to govern the renewal of its software and publication practices.

Read More
Back to Basics – the Davis-Bacon Act Conformance Process

A client asked me to write a step-by-step guide to Davis-Bacon Act (“DBA”) conformances. A conformance is the process for setting a prevailing wage and fringe benefit standard for job positions missing from a wage determination. This blog is meant for practitioners and contractors who must deal with conformances. It is an a summary adapted from my prior work product.

Read More
Nondisplacement Revoked Again: The Right of First Refusal for Employment By Federal Contractor Employees Was Already Gone, But DOL Just Buried the Rules.

DOL completed part of its deregulatory efforts yesterday when it fully revoked the regulations issued by former President Biden’s Administration on so-called nondisplacement of workers. The new DOL action involved the rescission of regulations published by the previous administration in 2023 requiring contractors and subcontractors to give qualified employees the right of first refusal of employment with a successor contract.  

Read More
When It Comes to Prevailing Wage Laws, the New Revolutionary FAR Overhaul is Not Very Revolutionary in Spirit

I have looked at the FAR Part 22 labor and employment provision changes in the proposed Revolutionary FAR Overhaul. To my eyes they don’t seem so “revolutionary.” Mostly, what they do is move the interpretive regulations to the new FAR Companion or other resources. That may reduce their importance. And that may make it easier to evade compliance. But that isn’t likely to change much for the prevailing wage field since the FAR regulations were simply a restatement of the Department of Labor’s (“DOL’s”) Part 4 and 5 regulations found in 29 Code of Federal Regulation. Those DOL regulations have been around for a long time. Taking provisions out of the regulatory book (yet leaving DOL’s regulatory scheme in place) and leaving existing statutory provisions on the books, does NOT constitute a “revolution.”

Read More