Posts in By Daniel Abrahams
Nondisplacement Revoked Again: The Right of First Refusal for Employment By Federal Contractor Employees Was Already Gone, But DOL Just Buried the Rules.

DOL completed part of its deregulatory efforts yesterday when it fully revoked the regulations issued by former President Biden’s Administration on so-called nondisplacement of workers. The new DOL action involved the rescission of regulations published by the previous administration in 2023 requiring contractors and subcontractors to give qualified employees the right of first refusal of employment with a successor contract.  

Read More
When It Comes to Prevailing Wage Laws, the New Revolutionary FAR Overhaul is Not Very Revolutionary in Spirit

I have looked at the FAR Part 22 labor and employment provision changes in the proposed Revolutionary FAR Overhaul. To my eyes they don’t seem so “revolutionary.” Mostly, what they do is move the interpretive regulations to the new FAR Companion or other resources. That may reduce their importance. And that may make it easier to evade compliance. But that isn’t likely to change much for the prevailing wage field since the FAR regulations were simply a restatement of the Department of Labor’s (“DOL’s”) Part 4 and 5 regulations found in 29 Code of Federal Regulation. Those DOL regulations have been around for a long time. Taking provisions out of the regulatory book (yet leaving DOL’s regulatory scheme in place) and leaving existing statutory provisions on the books, does NOT constitute a “revolution.”

Read More
Back to Basics: the Successor Contractor Rule Embodied In Section 4(c) of the Service Contract Act

This back-to-basics blog just touches on a few of the many possible issues that come up under the SCA section 4(c) successor contractor rule. That rule can require successor contractor to pay not less than the wages and fringes set forth in the predecessor’s collective bargaining agreement. It is a very complex area of the law, and it is one place where the engagement of  competent SCA counsel may aid in dealing with disputes.

Read More
Non-Standard Service Contract Act (“SCA”) Wage Determinations (“WDs”) Can Be an Unfair Trap for Unwary Contractors

DOL is issuing so-called non-standard Service Contract Act (“SCA”) wage determinations (“WDs”) using a numbering scheme which deceives contractors and results in inadvertent violations of the rules regarding furnishing of health & welfare (“H&W”) benefits.

Read More
Applicability of the Davis-Bacon Act to Workers Who Perform Testing, Adjusting and Balancing (“TAB”) Work on HVAC Systems (AAM No. 247)

Are workers who perform testing, adjusting and balancing (“TAB “) work on heating, ventilating, and air conditioning  (“HVAC”)  systems “laborers or mechanics” to whom Davis-Bacon requirements may be applicable? Under what circumstances is TAB work on HVAC systems part of the construction, alteration, and/or repair on a DBA-covered project, and hence subject to DBA labor standards?

Read More
The One Big Beautiful Tax Bill Proves Why the FLSA Is Still the Most Important Law Enacted By Congress

My candidate for the most important law enacted by Congress is the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). This law had perhaps the greatest economic impact upon the most Americans of any legislation. And its legacy endures even today, as it makes an appearance in the so-called One Big Beautiful Tax Bill as the instrument to partially deliver Trump’s promised no tax on overtime.

Read More
Back to Basics: What is a Belo Plan, How Does It Impact Overtime Compensation, and Can Government Contractors Use Such a Compensation Method?

This blog goes back-to-basics explains the origin of and requirements to set up a so-called “Belo plan” for overtime compensation. Belo plans are a form of guaranteed overtime compensation. Failed Belo plans, which don’t meet the legal requirements, are still guaranteed fixed salaries for the scheduled hour paid, and thus may be eligible for half-time coefficient premium treatment.

Read More
Pay Up You Deadbeat: Frequency of Payment of Wages on U.S. Government Contracts

How often employers must run their payroll for federal government contract work is dependent on the contract terms and where you are performing the work. The requirement usually varies from weekly to monthly, but employers need to review both your contract and state and local wage laws and regulations. The answer is that “it depends.”

Read More