I have looked at the FAR Part 22 labor and employment provision changes in the proposed Revolutionary FAR Overhaul. To my eyes they don’t seem so “revolutionary.” Mostly, what they do is move the interpretive regulations to the new FAR Companion or other resources. That may reduce their importance. And that may make it easier to evade compliance. But that isn’t likely to change much for the prevailing wage field since the FAR regulations were simply a restatement of the Department of Labor’s (“DOL’s”) Part 4 and 5 regulations found in 29 Code of Federal Regulation. Those DOL regulations have been around for a long time. Taking provisions out of the regulatory book (yet leaving DOL’s regulatory scheme in place) and leaving existing statutory provisions on the books, does NOT constitute a “revolution.”
Read MoreI’ve been on the lookout for what the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul would do to FAR Part 22 that governs the application of federal labor laws to government contracts. As it turns out, the overhauled Part 22 mostly reorganizes, but doesn’t rewrite, the regulations. That said, the interim “new 22” could spawn confusion during the transition to final new 22.
Read MoreWith the advent of a second Donald Trump administration, I had expected significant policy and enforcement changes at the Department of Labor. However, the President’s selection of Lori Chavez-DeRemer suggests changes will be course corrections, not u-turns.
Read MoreLast week, a Texas Federal Court granted a permanent injunction that strikes down the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) much-maligned ban on employee non-compete agreements. Many tout this ruling as a HUGE victory for employers. But which employers? Current ones? Future ones? Perhaps “we have met the enemy and he is us” (thanks Walt Kelly and Pogo).
Read More